Today marks the 30th anniversary of the Argentine surrender and the ending of the Falklands War. I'm going to put down some thoughts on the war and its consequences:
- The Falklands conflict is probably the highest intensity war we have fought since 1945. In Afghanistan we lose one or two soldiers a week. In the Falklands, we had 255 killed in just over six weeks.
- The failure of the UK to see this coming and take adequate measures to prevent it reflects very badly on the Thatcher government.
- British forces were not properly equipped for the conflict - they used semi-automatic rifles and ships were inadequately able to defend themselves.
- Further to this, the key ship in the campaign was Hermes with its large complement of Harriers; a ship that would have been unavailable a couple of years later. Invincible on its own could not have done the job.
- American support was vital for the British victory in this war - without the AIM-9L Sidewinders and the use of Ascension Island, things would be a lot harder for the British.
- Mobile land-based anti-shipping missiles are potent indeed.
- International political opinion no longer accepts the resolution of territorial disputes by armed force.
- Perception is nine-tenths of a war - the BLACK BUCK missions had a psychological effect far greater than their military one, as did the sinking of General Belgrano.
- "Short victorious wars" usually turn out to be anything but - this is a case in point.
- The Argentine military does not now have the capability to launch a successful invasion of the islands - there is also no political will for an actual war in Argentina over this matter.
- Apart from the Falklands War, there are very few conflicts in British history that have actually started from a direct attack on our territory - we mostly come to the aid of allies.
1 comment:
Agreed all the blood is on the junta's hands
Post a Comment